I have signed up with Thomas Nelson publishers to receive free books in exchange for posting my review at www.booksneeze.com. My first review is for a short biography of John Bunyan.
The book gives a brief overview of John Bunyan's life, and shows some interesting snapshots of his struggle as a poor working-class tinker, and eventually as a fearless preacher of the biblical Gospel in the face of a strict political-religious climate in the second half of 17th century England.
The books also gives some background and premise for Bunyan's great work Pilgrim's Progress. Writing it while in prison for refusing to attend services of the Church of England, and instead preaching to the "heathen" in his surrounding community (an activity forbidden by the religious leaders), it quickly gained great notoriety and spread across his small home town and eventually all over Europe, even into the hands of the great John Owen who would plead for Bunyan's release from prison. Bunyan spent around 12 years in prison for what would seem today to be hardly a crime. 12 devastating years away from his wife and small children (one of whom was blind, his oldest Mary).
I found this book to be a very good brief overview of a man whom I have never read about. I would recommend reading it and I hope to read more about John Bunyan in the future.
Book Review of John Bunyan by Kevin Belmonte
Sunday, April 04, 2010 at 4:22 PM Posted by Daniel
Labels: books, John Bunyan 0 comments
A Celibate Priest's Sex Book?
Wednesday, May 20, 2009 at 7:30 AM Posted by Daniel
It's a confusing thing when a Catholic monk writes a book about sex. How would he know anything? This is somewhat disturbing to me. Maybe it's a good thing for the Catholics?
Labels: books, Catholic, sex 0 comments
Wilson vs. Hitchens
Wednesday, May 13, 2009 at 7:30 AM Posted by Daniel
Doug Wilson has one of the most entertaining styles of writing, which I enjoy. I've recently taken delight in his takes on Christopher Hitchens' polemic God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything.
Suppose you went to see some fantastic illusionist, and he did something remarkable, like levitate himself. His beautiful assistant with insufficient clothing -- and this might have something to do with the success of the trick -- comes out on stage and passes some metal hoops every which way around the floating body. Jeepers, you think, and head on home scratching your noggin. When you get there, you find yourself in a discussion with your cousin who used to do a small time illusionist act of his own down at the local Ramada Inn, and he explains to you how the trick is done. He doesn't have to be a big time headliner -- he just has to have enough experience to be able to explain how such tricks are pulled off.
I am the Ramada Inn guy, only drop the illusionist aspect now. I write a lot, like Hitchens, and I know how to put a sentence or two together. I believe I also know how to make a metaphor crawl up your back and make an unpleasant smacky noise in your ear. Or, more pleasantly, to get a couple of cute zephyrs to fool around with your hair on a warm spring day. Here, pick a card, any card.
Labels: books, Christopher Hitchens, Douglas Wilson 0 comments
Collision: Hitchens vs. Wilson
Monday, May 11, 2009 at 7:05 AM Posted by Daniel
Labels: books, Christopher Hitchens, debate, Douglas Wilson, movie 0 comments
Tim Keller speaking at Stanford
Monday, April 06, 2009 at 6:06 PM Posted by Daniel
Tim Keller did a speaking tour a little while back, in which he discussed his book The Reason for God (which is superb). Below is a video of one such session at Stanford University. Also below is the Q&A session, which is especially good. For all the other sessions, you can go to the Veritas Forum website and click to Tim Keller's page. For other Tim Keller related media, there is this page devoted to providing all the links.
Q&A:
Labels: books, God, Tim Keller 0 comments
The New Media Frontier
Tuesday, October 28, 2008 at 5:44 PM Posted by Daniel
I don't like change. I don't adapt well. I want to keep doing things my own slow way. There's this silly notion circulating out there that the internet has revolutionized media and the way that information is handled and distributed. Who would believe that? I'm stupid for writing that, as I am currently using the technology I am denouncing, sort of like those philosophers that like to use logic to explain away everything, including the logic used to reach their conclusion. Oh well, I guess I can accept it.
Anyway, there is a new book that came out recently called The New Media Frontier: Blogging, Vlogging, and Podcasting for Christ. It's all about how the internet is revolutionizing the way Christian ministry is being done, at least in terms of the means (media) of how ministry is being done and communicated, for surely no one is breaking new ground in how to help people know the Savior. This is the same across generations because the truth never changes. But ministry in the 21st century with its internet is vastly different than that of olden days, like when Gutenberg unveiled his shiny press and Bibles were printed for the first time in history. Or when the first primitive motion picture camera was invented by Thomas Edison who offered to give the patent to the church, which rejected the generous proposal in swift culturally-retarded fashion (from The History Channel's documentary The Passion: Religion and the Movies). As some would say, the methods have changed, but the message stays the same. That's not to say that the medium doesn't preach, because it does. This helpful book attempts to draw the line between preserving the message of the Gospel and letting the medium shape the message.
The "new media" is the new landscape which the internet has been formed into. This includes the infamous blog, where any schmuck with an opinion (myself included) can broadcast it worldwide in an instant without paying a dime. Never before in history has something so useful, and at the same time so dangerous, come into being. To quote a somewhat cheesy but great movie, "with great power comes great responsibility." It's the same with all potentially useful things. Books can be used to praise God or they can be used to control people. Likewise, the internet can be used for beneficial ministry or it can be the breeding grounds for sex offenders (watch Law and Order). This book points out the tremendous potential for good to be done through the "new media", while staunchly warning against its misuse. I would recommend it to anyone wanting to know more about technology that is shaping our world currently, and specifically its influence on Christian ministry.
Labels: blog, books 0 comments
The Emergent church - I guess this is the continuation of my crappy series a while back that I never did much with...so Part 2
Sunday, June 08, 2008 at 7:30 AM Posted by Daniel
Doug Pagitt makes this statement in the perspectives book Listening to the Beliefs of Emerging Churches: “The idea that there is a necessary distinction of matter from spirit, or creation from creator, is being reconsidered.” (pg. 142)
Earlier in this section, Pagitt relates this “reconsidering” of historically accepted Christian doctrine (specifically of God being separate from his creation, as in Genesis 1:1) to the discoveries of quantum physics and their partial overturning of understood Newtonian science in the modern world (specifically, the idea of the wave-particle behavior of light is addressed). In doing so he makes the assumption that Christian doctrine is much like science, in that its “discoveries” are merely products of human ingenuity, rather than revelation from God. Therefore he warrants the idea of a theological evolution of sorts since this opens the door for Christianity to no longer be defined solely by Scripture, but instead by any which way that the prevailing culture may take it.
It seems to me that these emergent folks, in efforts to try to see value in other religious ideas (of which I would say I agree with), are actually stepping over the boundaries of Christianity and into what we might just be able to call heresy.
It seems like they do so only for the sake of rebelling against accepted tradition, and to try and forge a new path and new traditions. The funny thing is that 50 or 100 years down the road, I would bet that those that are following this emergent trend (if there are any left) will be firmly established in the “new” traditions of the apparently-still-emerging church. It is impossible I believe to avoid tradition in any organization. Even if you’re trying at all costs to go against the tides of how things have been done in the past, your tradition then simply becomes rebellion. And if your organization is based on rebellion, on always trying to find a different way to do something, then in the end you are left only with questions and empty hands rather than answers and hands full of God’s words, since the real business of trusting what God says is never gotten around to and is pushed to the bottom of the priority list. I am fully for asking questions and demonstrating humility by having the courage to say “I don’t know,” but when all you have are questions and loosy-goosy theology, when your beliefs are challenged and pressed, you may find that the foundations of sand have washed away. In order to get somewhere, there needs to be a solid foundation to walk on, and not as Rob Bell says a “trampoline” of theology. Instead of jumping up and down on the trampoline of theology, and in effect getting nowhere but back to where we started, we need to stop playing around, set our sights on Christ, pack our bags, and walk to him. Just an opinion though J.
Labels: books, church, doug pagitt, emergent 0 comments
The Dangers of Reading
Friday, May 23, 2008 at 6:00 PM Posted by Daniel
I think I am addicted to buying books. Amazon.com and half.com have books for much lower prices than you find in Barnes and Noble, and I don’t think I can stay away. For the last few years I’ve really developed a hunger for good books. It’s weird because I used to despise reading in school. In English class, I did my work without reading the assigned books, and always tried to find a short-cut by hunting for Cliff’s Notes or existing book reports so I wouldn’t have to read the actual thing. In retrospect, I probably put more effort towards cutting corners and created more stress for myself by procrastinating like mad and getting bad grades than if I had just read the dang book. Particularly, I really hated history. I couldn’t understand the point of studying the past. When I asked my history teacher in high school about my frustration, I heard the oft-quoted sentence by philosopher George Santayana: “those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” I understood that it was valuable for important people, such as presidents and kings, to learn history so as not to repeat past mistakes in world policy or whatever, but how did this apply to me, some skinny schmo in high school with a serious social deficiency? Well, I’ve grown out of this immature view, which frankly was mostly fueled by my disdain for reading my history book, and I’ve really become very interested in history. I think the truth is much stranger than fiction; and much more interesting in my opinion. As a result, I rarely buy fiction books.
The danger though I see with my reading, especially with books pertaining directly to Christian theology and practice, is that it can easily lead to the reinforcing of a false dichotomy between theory—that which pertains to my mind, and practice—that which pertains to my actions. This is an Aristotelian distinction, reinforced greatly by the ‘supreme’ mind of Descartes, and does not reflect the philosophy espoused in the Bible. It basically says, as I understand it, that intellectual life consists of that which you observe and ponder abstractly (theoria), and that which you tangibly act on (praxis). So according to this as it pertains to reading books, I can set up my own theory about how life should be—perhaps an idealized Christian-y world where things make sense and I’m content to feed my brain and muse, and the actual world—filled with pain and failure that falls far short of the ideal. This topic is too grand for me to try analyzing here, but I will offer the explanation offered by Lesslie Newbigin in his book Proper Confidence: that in fact the duty of a Christian who knows God as he has revealed himself, is not characterized by this separation dichotomy of theoria and praxis, where life is compartmentalized into that which is in my head, isolated from that which my hands grasp (dare I say vaguely Gnostic?). Rather, it is characterized simply by the single act of belief and obedience. That is, our lives are based on the fact that God speaks truth, and we respond simply by believing him through obedience to him.
Most times, the world does not want to behave this way; instead we want to speculate, brainstorm, navel-gaze, and work up our own utopian theory of how life should be (religion, politics, etc.), and then maybe, if we get around to it, enact the policy or whatever to accomplish the ideal that has originated from our brains. The Bible presents an alternate (and better) solution to the confusion that our world offers. He offers himself as the king, who is to be loved, trusted, and obeyed in all things. There is no speculation required, but simply trust in him who is the Father that knows all.
So how does this relate to reading? Well, I guess the point is that when I read it is sometimes easy to slip into a world of fantasy where I somehow take the true spiritual concepts I read in the book, and wrongly attach them to my own life as if my mind’s resonance with the truth were the same thing as me living the truth that I read. If that’s confusing, I will try and put it in other words: I selfishly ascribe the truth which I recognize when I read it, to my own life even when the two don’t line up. I don’t know if anyone else has this problem, but it is convicting to me that I have recognized this about myself. Perhaps to a certain degree, this ascribing business is due to the notion I put forth, which is I think for the most part subconscious, that because I make an effort to read challenging books, whereas so many people don’t in our culture, I am somehow more righteous than those who don’t. Therefore, since I revere so much the truth that I read, I link the righteousness conveyed in the truth with the very fact that I’m reading it. It’s pretty sick. It seems though that this might be something more common than most realize. I’ve seen some things in other people that suggest this. When they read some new popular book on “how the church should be” or something, and then blog about it because they are apparently such superior Christians because they read it and now want to haughtily promote the ideas in the book (perhaps on Facebook or something), even though they themselves are a far cry from what the book teaches. I believe to some degree, it’s the theoria-praxis dichotomy in action, but at bottom it’s just an intellectualized, churched-up version of pride and lazy theology combined.
I would do much better to simply believe in God’s truth and be humbly obedient to it.
Do Hard Things
Friday, May 16, 2008 at 6:00 PM Posted by Daniel
I’m in a posting mood right now so I’ll just add another one on the crap pile today. I like how I get in these moods where I’m just like, “ok this time, I’m going to start posting every day,” but it never lasts more than a couple days. Then I go for months and months with nothing on here and then pick back up like there wasn’t a huge void there, and expect anyone at all to read it. I admit it’s silly. Maybe someone in like a month will stumble upon it. But I’ve sort of resigned to not caring anymore if anyone reads anything, though it would be nice. I write stuff all the time, it’s just never really presentable in any sort of coherent way. But I can probably muster something every now and then. Plus I found a way to post just by writing an email, so there isn’t the hassle of navigating to the freaking page every time and putting up with the slightly terrible interface that’s on here. So that’s nice. If anyone does actually read this, let me know, and maybe it will provide a little more motivation. But if not that’s fine, I’ll just keep talking to myself, or maybe let another year go by before I post again.
I notice that many people I know also exhibit this pattern of long periods of non-posting, and then a serious “get-back-on-track!” post that explains why they haven’t posted in forever. I’m not sure why we feel the need to explain why we don’t devote time to something that very few people care about, other than the need to feel like someone does care what we write. I suppose I do care some, and granted it might be pretty neat if people were actually looking forward to what I write next and checked it every day (although the use of the word “neat” may hinder that happening). But I am also accepting the cold hard truth that that will most likely not happen unless a lot of effort were put into it, which is probably not going to happen since blogging is not exactly one of the most important things on my agenda. Maybe the nice email-in feature will help out since I’m apparently too lazy to….enough already….on to the stinkin’ post.
I just read this new book by Alex and Brett Harris called Do Hard Things. It is targeted at teens, but the premise sounded really interesting so I thought I’d pick it up. Plus I used a gift card, so that’s good. The message of this book probably destroys my explanation of why I don’t post, since much of it has to do with being lazy, so I’ll work on that, but anyway... This book is geared towards teens and wants to goad youngins to not wasting their “adolescent” years (a term whose concept the authors pretty much dismantle and I agree with). It explains the pattern our society has set up to where nothing is really expected of teenagers because we don’t think they can contribute anything to society since they’re always playing Xbox, picking a fight, or texting their underachieving slackers of friends on their cell phones about things of absolutely no value to anyone in the universe. This is such a perceptive observation, but also a rather obvious one if you go the mall or to the movies on Friday night and see the culture of misfits and retards that our country is producing at an alarming rate (myself included, though my parents did a good job). The point here is not to insult them (because much of it is not their faults), but to point out how messed up our culture is where teenagers are merely thought of as being in “adolescence,” the concept of someone in transition from childhood to adulthood, somehow justifying the bane and uselessness that characterizes so much of their “adolescent” existence in teenage years. The problem in this worldview is that there is no cultural right-of-passage that exists in our society largely because no one can really give a definition of adulthood, or more accurately—maturity.
Biblically, maturity means that I take responsibility for myself, my actions, my soul, my wife, my kids, my family, my church, my society, my culture, and my world and say that I’m going to repent from worldly thinking and seek to live for the glory of God. In American culture, however, there is a complete abdication of responsibility in so many arenas of life (especially for men I might add), primarily (I would say) because there is no real prevailing truth to speak of in this world we live in, according to the philosophy of postmodernism which has permeated so much of our culture’s thinking. There’s nothing that anyone can agree on, since everyone has their own worldview/religion (or lack thereof) and we all seem to accept that no religion/worldview is better than another. The problem in logic here is simple, since we’ve all as a culture, bought into the religion of Secularism: that God has nothing to do with how we live; He’s simply concerned with “spiritual” things—we don’t realize the serious lack of sound reasoning here in that we want to claim that no religion is better than another, this itself being a religious statement in essence, since it cannot be empirically proven. That is another tangent I could go on, but I’ll save it for now.
The result is a lot of parents and families that raise kids into their teen years, but nothing is expected of them since we see them as in “adolescence,” meaning we see them as transitioning from immaturity to maturity by some sort of natural process I suppose. Apparently we think the maturity fairy will come in the night to set them free from their purposeless destination and give them a reason to live, instead of the parents imparting this to their children intentionally according to the design of God. A child is so much the product of its environment, especially its parents (though we should never discount the absoluteness of personal responsibility). This is not to mention the staggering amount of children raised in poverty and in disgusting situations where they have no fathers or their mothers are drug addicts, and the children just mimic the behavior of their parents because it is all they know.
The book basically says all this in a slightly nicer way, and gives teenagers a strong push in the right direction by showing many examples of teenagers “doing hard things,” such as helping a political candidate or starting an organization to end poverty. I admit that during junior-high/high-school that I felt much the same way, that I really didn’t have much of an idea what I was doing or any sort of real plan to speak of in life. This was largely due to my culture’s imparting its worldview on me, but I can accept full responsibility for my stupidity here, and ultimately it’s everyone’s responsibility as a human facing God in the end (though each will be judged according to his own areas of authority, such as a father for his children). I was strongly motivated by this book, even though I am not a teenager anymore, and the message is applicable to anyone in need of a kick in the rear. It reminds me that maturity is not something you get when you get your driver’s license or turn 21, or something stupid like that that our culture teaches. There’s plenty of old people we could say are in a state of perpetual adolescence, if you will. Maturity is something that is obtained through the grace of God as he molds his children, and something that is so greatly facilitated through parents leading their children into it. I’m thankful my parents taught me this. I also wish to do the same with mine someday, Lord willing.
Labels: books, do hard things, laziness, teenagers 0 comments